I, Human: Part I – The Human Machine.
Preface.
Some time ago I was part of a discussion with my favorite adversary, Jeff. This discussion entailed love, and the chemical reactions thereof. In this I was reminded one of the great Myths of Modern Culture. That we are more than what our body is. The we are higher than the function that create us.
I had planned to create my arguments and have it out in a week, but because of how extensive of an activity this became, and several personal matters, I am finally posting this two months later.
This is the first of a series of arguments known as “I, Human.” Which is appropriate in two ways. One it probably could be posted as a series of short stories, and is about the size of the Asimovian classic, and for second, well I guess you have read I, Robot, you understand. (And so help me, the person who says they’ve “seen the movie”…)
The first article in this series is the Human Machine.
The Human Machine.
There is a common consensus that we are separate from the universe around us. This belief is the core of
human art, religion, and most philosophy. The idea that who we are is separate from our physical body, that we are more than just machines and computers. This is ingrained in every part of our culture, the religious man asks, “If we are just computers, why do we seek god?” The philosopher asks, “If we are computers, than why are we aware?” The artist asks, “How is it that I create, if I am a machine?” It seems that the common theme of these arguments is that neurons can’t understand the complexity that it is to be human.
Honestly, this is a fair assessment, a neuron on its own can’t understand the thought process that it is responsible for making this article any more than an electron surging through my computer can make this word display I am typing on. However, trillions of electrons surging through billions of transistors through the processor and coprocessors of my computer combined with some software information, viola! I have a word processor. The brain works in a strikingly similar way..
It is common knowledge by now that every thought, movement, function, is correlated with a neurological response. The data for this is so consistent that we are able to read minds using this data. Yet the debate still carries on. Boiled down the argument against the machine man goes as a follows:
- Human beings don’t operate the same way machinery does
- That there are certain traits and actions that are unexplainable through this world view.
- Machines cannot be aware.
These arguments sound good at face value, however as much as we want to believe differently, the evidence seems suggest otherwise.
The Workings of the Human Machine.
All things considered, we do kind of work like machines. A machine is comprised of several moving and non-moving parts, generally has either a supply of power or an active force to perform its function, and most typically has some sort of user interface for operation. More advanced machines have cooling units, audio and video receptors and measuring devices to automatically update the machine on surrounding information. And this barely scratches the surface.
Through careful study of neurosciences and physiology we find that on all classifications of a machine, human beings match up.
Transistors and Binary Codes.
Have you ever wondered what those ones and zeros actually spell out to in the programming of your computer? If you are completely technologically lamen, binary code is a base two system spelled out in 1s and 0s (Though technically any code using any two responses or characters can be considered “binary”). In the case of your programming this means that a 1 looks like this:
0000 0001
And a letter as simple as “A” translates to this:
0100 0001
What this translates to is a series of Transistors in the processor or the coprocessors of on your motherboard. Each 0 in binary means off, and each one means on. So in the terms of A above, we have six transistors that remain off and 2 transistors that remains on. Shockingly enough, this very similar to the way our brain operates.
Every thought and action starts in the brain, not unlike a computers processor. Stimuli (outward or inward) begin a beautiful process. The transceiver (sending) end of a neuron (brain cells), called an axon, sends out a plasma membrane called a presynaptic neuron. This presynaptic neuron connects with a postsynaptic neuron (receiver) end of another neuron attached to a dendrite (The opposite of an axon). This process is called synapse.
This sends a signal to one of even one of the several dendrites in the neurofiber, in which the neuron will decide whether or not it has anything to do with what the other neuron is trying to do within its cell body. It then sends a signal to the other neuron in a binary system of Yes or No signals. More Yes signals than no signals, the neuron then transfers through its cell body (which acts like a capacitor in this way) and sends the signal on. More no signals the membrane detaches and attempts another neuron for the process. This is happening anywhere from 0.9 to 89.41 meters per seconds every seconds of the day. This repeated over and over again becomes a complete thought, processes, or actions in an individual.
Like transistors, neurons are either active or inactive in any thought process, depending on which ones are active, and which ones are inactive the thought or action is different. The major difference is the causation. In computers the code comes before the activation, whereas in the brain we can only garner a code afterwards. This is because the brains only user is itself, so the system must be more experimental than planned.
Several Moving and Nonmoving Parts.
Out of all the possible arguments, this is the simplest to prove. It is generally accepted that there are several separate but dependant functions that comprise of our body. We have a heart and circulatory system to supply nourishment, water, and energy to different parts of the body, the digestive system which converts food into usable energy. The body in the end is a complex unit built for one goal, the very longevity of itself.
Fuel for the Human Machine.
Machines most generally require some sort of force for them to work. Simple machines require weight being pressed on them, manual machines require a person to actively move their various parts, electrical machines require a constant supply of electricity, and fuel powered machines need the energy garnered from fuel, thus you place weight on one side of a lever the other side goes up, you crank your jack and your car goes up, you plug in your computer and it powers on, and you put gas in your car and it is able to run.
Human beings in our power method are more like cars. We require constant carbon-based fuel in order to run our systems properly. The difference between us and cars I guess is we don’t use an explosion method in order to power us! Human beings are made of several complex chemicals, including amino acids, proteins, lipids, peptides, etc. And thus we require a fuel that is similar to those materials in order to convert them into usable energy.
The fuel I am of course referring to is food. And thus where our power supply is located is our digestive system. The digestive system works taking raw food and breaking it down and separating the processable chemicals. The usable chemicals (vitamins, proteins, acids etc.) and some of the useless or harmful chemicals (trans fatty acids, harmful bacteria) are converted in order to pass through the walls of the stomach and put through a filtering system, like the kidneys and the liver to ensure the fuel is clean before using it to power the body. This is not unlike how gasoline is made.
Our respiratory system also plays a factor in fueling our body, by absorbing oxygen, in which we require to power every cell in our body. All these fuels are taken to every part of our body via the circulatory system, powering the body, allowing it to go on to your day to day tasks.
User Friendly.
A machine is generally useless unless there is a method in which a user can operate the piece of machinery (any time this is impossible, we consider the machine broken). In more modern machines the more essential processes (such as measurement, pressure, regulations) is taken over by a computer, in which can perform the calculations without troubling the user. Human beings are no different.
Our brain is a cross between the user and the computer of the human machine. The lower parts of our brain (the “reptilian brain”) operates as a computer, performing all of the essential, yet mundane and repetitive processes, such as breathings and heartbeat (performed by the brainstem), The collection and compilation of sensory information (via the temporal and occipital lobes of the brain), and sending regulating and sending neural and hormonal informationthrough the system (via the hypothalamus and pituitary gland, respectively).
The user interface is located in the frontal and parential lobes of the brain, or the “mammalian brain”; this where our conscious judgments, reasoning, and motor functions take place. For all intents and purposes this is the region of the machine that controls the functions of the rest of the brain. It does this through a complex system of nerve fiber, which sends a complex array of positive and negative signals and feedback through a miraculous systems known as the nervous system.
Cooling Units.
Hear that humming from your computer as you are working on it? That’s not just the energy running through your mother board, nor is it little demons crawling in your computer. That is a fan that’s sole purpose in existence is to move the charged (heated) air away from the motherboard. It turns out that excess heat is pretty bad for the motherboard, and well most machinery for that matter. That is why most machinery, especially machinery that is electronic has cooling systems.
Well, our body doesn’t like heat more than any other machine. But we don’t have nifty fans, heat syncs, or air conditioning units. What we do have is a tolerance for water, and sweat. Sweat cools the body allowing it to work in harsh conditions, or continue to do strenuous work. But cooling isn’t the only thing our body does. It also protects from the cold.
When we are exposed to freezing temperatures our nerves send a signal to our brain that it is cold, this information is relayed through the thalamus to the hypothalamus of the brain. The hypothalamus then begins a process known as homeostasis. Homeostasis is the process in which the body regulates itself. In cold temperatures the body begins to shiver and increase its metabolism in order to generate heat. If this is not enough the body will begin to restrict the blood vessels in the arms and legs in order to draw more heat to the core of the body, trying to ensure the survival of the body.
Video and Audio.
You are chatting with a friend on the internet who lives hundreds of miles away, luckily you have installed on your computer a webcam and a microphone. These wondrous devices make face to face-to-face teleconferencing possible. Not only is it making the world into one giant neighborhood, but it is pushing business deals faster than ever possible. But how is it possible?
This all starts with a camcorder, which receives light through a lens, focuses it using an iris, and transmits the data in the form electric signals in order to be translated and saved to an onboard computer (or tape if you have an analog camcorder).
The microphone works by taking the vibration of a diaphragm in the receiver of the microphone, and then translated to electric signals. These electric signals in computers are stored so they can be reproduced. Certain machines not only have webcams and microphones, but facial and vocal recognition systems. These systems are based off of determining a pattern on a persons face and comparing them with previous patterns already entered into the machine.
Not only do we have this, we couldn’t imagine life without it. It turns out that the human eye, as well as sight works in the exact same way. Light transmits through the cornea, and then the inner lens of the eye. The optic nerves determine the intensity of the light and force the iris to focus or un-focus accordingly. The retina then converts the light into electric signals and sends it to your occipital lobe. Your occipital lobe translates this information into a picture that we see every conscious moments (and some unconscious ones). Without going into too much detail this information is then transferred to the parental lobe, which tells you where it is then to the frontal lobe to tell you what it is, then the temporal lobe which tells you what this means to you, as well as records the information in the hypothalamus, to be possibly later turned into long term memory.
One can point out that cameras do not perceive depth perception. Our body gets around this by the curvature of the lens, as well as having two different cameras. These the dual eye system allows for our brain to interpret the curvature and relative distance of an object or person. The other reason why a camera cannot interpret Three dimensional objects is a matter of both the projection technology on an interface you use (pictures, moniters), as well as inferior hardware and software to render this image. Luckily, the real world is a much better display than even the most advanced technology (as cool as holograms are) cannot match; it’s like living in perpetual HD.
The webcam metaphor has a second part which bears over viewing: the microphone that is installed in your computer, or the camcorder itself. This microphone works by vibrating a small metallic membrane at the resonance of your voice. This vibration is converted into electronic signals and sent to the computer (or an unfortunate karaoke machine). It turns out that our ear works in the exact same way. The only difference between my ear, and the microphone on your computer, is that I have better acoustics. This is given to us by our outer ear, which is perfectly designed to reflect vibrations into the ear canal, where it will build acoustics, and sound clearer.
Potentiometers, Accelerometers and Touch Screens.
Pick up your PS3 controller, move your left analog stick, and your character moves in relatively the same direction you moved your character sheet. How does the machine know the difference between up or down? Left or right? This is made possible by a Potentiometer. A potentiometer measures the resistance of a small piece (usually a coil) inside the switch that is having force pushed against it. Basically, as you are moving the analog stick, a small piece of metal inside is being pushed or pulled at a predictable rate. This resistance is transmitted to your PS3 and it correlates with that action.
In this way the tendon is the bodies version of the potentiometer. A tendon is a fibrous tissue that connects muscle to the bone. In the last twenty years we have found that tendons not only connect muscles to the bone, but they measure how much force is being applied to them, and when the muscle is fully extended. It sends this signal through the nervous system to the brain (the premotor cortex), which sends a signal back to the muscles (via the primary motor cortex) which tells the muscles how to react to this strain. Once again we have a measurement from extension to compression, that garners a reaction from a main computer.
Put down the controller, and pick up your iPod. Notice how, when on safari or watching a video, you can flip onto either side and the screen will turn. This is due to a device known as an accelerometer. The accelerometer is a small cylindrical device, with an even smaller cylindrical device within it, falling from one point to another; this essentially the pull of gravity, and the direction of gravity. When placed into your iPod, it turns the screen. When placed in our inner ear, it tells us where we are standing.
The Vestibular System is the system in our brain that tells our head what position it is in, and thus is able to tell the body if it is standing up, leaning side to side, or falling on our face. This function is mostly due to the stataconia and the otoliths inside of it. In lamens terms it’s a big sack with “stones” in it (it’s really just calcium). The position of these stones inside the gelatinous sack tells the brain what position the head is in, allowing it to adjust the body accordingly. It’s because of the constant vibration and shifting of the head in cars that we become carsick (it is vibrating the otoliths rapidly).
Now that we’ve had fun with the accelerometer, if you’re lucky enough to own an iPod touch, run your finger across the touch screen. Ever wondered what makes that technology possible? Basically a fine and thin mesh grid is plotted out on the top screen. This machine measures all electronic changes, a bit of light pressure, and temperature changes in each one of the squares on the grid. The amount of squares that have pressure applied to send an electronic signal to the processor, telling it what you are touching.
The Nervous System has a very similar grid with a very similar function. The nerves in our skin are interweaved so we can sense all changes in temperature, all pressure and touch applied to it, and pain signals that may occur. It transmits this information to the Somatosensory area of our brain, which is responsible for knowing the parameters of our body, as well as interpreting the signals the nerve endings are sending. For this reason you can feel when it becomes chilly out, you can feel the hands as they touch you, and feel what your hands touch.
The Human Machine Conclusion.
It seems that we are much more like machines than we give credit. If we are to consider a machine as simply a series of moving and non-moving parts, that have power supply or an active force to utilize it, and generally has a form a user interface, than human beings fit the bill. The moving parts being our muscles and internal organs that allow for our greater survival, Our power coming from a consistent fuel we call food, Our brain acts as a user and a computer and operates in a binary system, we even have our own cooling system, write-back cache, RAM, and optical processors. The similarities between man and machine are far too great to ignore. So, all things considered… We do act like machines.
___________________________
[i] It should be noted that neurons actually can be activated several times in the same thought process.
[ii] We refer to this as <a href=”http://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Organic+fuel”>organic compounds.</a>
[iii] This is not too terribly unlike how cache works.
Part II Coming….
Join me for Part II of I, Human, where I explore what cannot be recreated through our knowledge, and ask again, is there something more?
[1] It should be noted that neurons actually can be activated several times in the same thought process.
[1] We refer to this as <a href=”http://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Organic+fuel”>organic compounds.</a>
[1] This is not too terribly unlike how cache works.
9 Comments »
Leave a Reply
-
Recent
-
Links
-
Archives
- May 2010 (1)
- February 2010 (1)
- January 2010 (1)
- July 2009 (1)
-
Categories
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS
This isn’t a comment per se but…you may find it to be of relevance. http://bit.ly/alYQQQ
[...] conceptual intersection between mind and brain.) Too often we confuse our metaphor for reality (See I, Human: Part I. See this and this where I discuss the issues/dangers of metaphor). Metaphor can illuminate but it [...]
Pingback by Mapping Clinical Manifestations of Psychiatric Disorders to the Underlying Neurophysiological Lattice: Towards a Vocabulary of the Ecology of Mind | Jeff's A.D.D. Mind | May 16, 2010 |
“…However, trillions of electrons surging through billions of transistors through the processor and coprocessors of my computer combined with some software information, viola! I have a word processor. The brain works in a strikingly similar way.” Unfortunately the latest research shows that this is wrong.
Before you go any further with your writing on this subject, I recommend that you read this post – http://bit.ly/9aYOAy – ESPECIALLY the “Interpretation of the Manuscript” and then watch the first video at http://bit.ly/1Wb29p from this series of videos that looks at the latest research on brain/mind. John Searle, who has been involved in the field of artificial intelligence and related fields, states that the computer/mind metaphor has done much more harm than good in terms of advancing our understanding of the brain/mind.
Reading and watching the programs suggested, I in no way, shape, or form believe that this takes any away from my argument. While I will admit, “The Human Machine” is an analogy, and a potentially dangerous one, however, I (and many others) feel that it is the best mechanism to explain human functionality and behavior as it is currently known (note that in the “Brain Series”, seen in your second link, words like “programs” and “mechanisms” are used by the experts).
John Searle is correct. If you were to construct a machine to mimic human personality, while believing that the brain could directly translate to our technology, you would quickly run across a slew of problems. The hippocampus, for instance, registers much more complex data than is written on RAM, and I would be particularly surprised if our neurons ran off a series of 8-bit binary strings. The fact is the human brain is far less centralized, and relies on multiple types of signals, wheras machines generally only run off of electricity and lasers.
This article series is an analogy, and should be taken as thus. I chose to use computers and machines for my first article for purpose of illustration. I do not wish to prove that we are cold mechanical machines (That would be Magic Trick Mentality), but rather that our personality, our feelings, our memories, and even ourselves are the result of pure biology, an intricate of synapse, action and reaction. This article is intended to make a fair argument against Cartesian Dualism, the idea that mind and body are separate, and to tear apart one of the biggest Myths of Modern Culture: The Metaphor of the Mind.
I don’t want to dampen your enthusiasm but…you’re missing the point…which is *not* that the analogy is dangerous…it’s that it is just the wrong one. The analogy points you in the wrong direction. That’s Searle’s point.
The brain literally reconstructs itself…literally changes its biology…based on its interaction with the world. A computer may be able to handle data from the outside world and its software may adapt but it does not rewire itself…it does not change the structure of its pathways (its wiring)…the brain, in contrast, does.
Ok, I can understand your grievances. However if we are to consider life as a mechanism, or a machine, we must beckon, “What is the function of this machine?” Simply put our function as living machines is to replicate and compensate. Considering this point for a second, if we are built to replicate and compensate than it is simply part of the mechanisms that makes us. Though we do not have the technology (however, brief glances into nanotechnology tells us that this is not very far off) to built a replicating and compensating machine, this does not mean that this function is anything but the programing and machinery.
You mention my argument as a “wrong” argument, and it leads me down the “wrong path,” however you have yet to give me any discernible argument to it. You simply rest on the laurels of an authority figure (without even telling me what he says).
I invite you to write a rebuttal, and I will give you the same courtesies you have given me. However if you’re just going to call my argument wrong, I’m going to have to consider this a difference of philosophy.
I hope you continue to read my article, because many of your questions have already been planned for the next two parts, the next part including that which cannot be replicated with our technology, and exploring if it is a higher property, or more than likely another part of our analogous machinery.
I do hope you take me on my offer, because, from what I remember you are a creative arguer, generally.
- Paradigm of Thought.
Here’s the quote from John Searle. “JOHN SEARLE: It’s a specific causal mechanism, we have to respect its [i.e., the mind's] specific biology. And for long time the computer metaphor was really an impediment in cognitive science because it led people to the illusion that the anatomy doesn’t really matter. All that matters is the program, you get the right program.
And I think for a whole lot of reasons that’s a very unintelligent view, and I think we’re getting out that have view. We have to, and what I like about this particular group is we all respect the anatomical,
biological specificity of the brain. It’s not an accidental organ. You can’t do it with just anything.”
********************
What I get out of the video (and I’ve gone on to listen to the others…yes…listen…while I’m programming I have the video going and I just listen to it) which is what my “faux” document was really getting at, is that we don’t yet have the vocabulary to describe what the human mind can do. The problem with the analogies – potentiometers and so forth – is that it is does not do just to the experience, to the phenomenon. Right now, as I write this, I am listening to Pachelbel’s Canon. Which set of wires and PS3 controllers and software language and in what combination will allow me to render this experience, this feeling I have when I am listening to this music and writing this response? Searle’s point is that you can’t do it without the biology – the brain – and any attempt to do so, such as the computer metaphor, will take you down the wrong path.
You wrote “if we are to consider life as a mechanism, or a machine, we must beckon, “What is the function of this machine?”” What I’m trying to say is that we need to dispense with the machine metaphor altogether. Life is not a mechanism or a machine.
Last point…our computers are, at bottom, just digital versions of the Babbage Engines except they are much smaller, are not mechanical, and can do things – manipulate zeroes and ones – at lightning speed. However…they have no idea they are doing it. While there are many things our minds do that we are not aware of…there are also many things we ARE aware of…such as self-reflexive monitoring of thoughts while writing blog post comments.
First, I apologize for my late post, but I have to first assure you that all of these very good questions are explainable through simple physical phenomena. Second I must urge patience, understand that this if the first of three articles touching on the idea of the human machine, my next article is about music, language, art, emotions, and explaining them as the functions of a complex organic machine. To answer many of these questions would simply ruin my planned articles. So, I urge more patience, hopefully by the end of next week I might be able to write part II.
No apology necessary. I just tried to slow you down before you went too far down the wrong path.