Paradigm Of Thought
Name: Jack Shawhan
Pen Name: Paradigm of Thought
Nationality: Citizen of Planet Earth
Meyers-Briggs Personality Type: INTP
Political Philosophy: Moderate Objectivist
Personal Philosophy: General Skeptic; Materialist
Moral Philosophy: Structured Relativist.
Belief System: Schrodinger Agnostic; Scientist.
Alignment: Lawful Neutral
Psychological School: Psychoanalytic/Learning Cognitive.
Teaching Method: Socratic.
Race: Human.
Goal: To unveil the myths of modern culture.
3 Comments »
Leave a Reply
-
Recent
-
Links
-
Archives
- May 2010 (1)
- February 2010 (1)
- January 2010 (1)
- July 2009 (1)
-
Categories
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS
Hello,
I was wondering if you would consider providing a ‘reciprocal’ link on your site to my ADHD blog http://mungosadhd.blogspot.com. I have just begun my journey of assessment and diagnosis, and would be interested to see if there is any similar stories to mine.
Respectfully yours,
Mungo
Hello Mungo,
Thank you for reading my blog, unfortunately I do not believe that my blog will be much use to yours, considering that my blog isn’t primarily an ADHD based blog. This blog has been built on the idea of dispelling what I consider the Myths of Modern Culture. It just happened that one day my goal coincided with yours. If you wish to link my A.D.D.: Not So Bad, I have no problem. But considering the purpose of my blog, I don’t know if I can help you.
Thank you for reading my blog, and I checked out yours. Keep up the good work.
Thanks Paradigm of Thought. I’m an atheist, enjoying your blog!
I had a philosophy prof once warn us about using Ockham’s Razor ‘entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem’ as an argument, because of the fact that there can indeed be complicated explanations that truthfully fit a set of observations than a simpler, although more aesthetically beautiful explanation. That being said, I’ve never believed in God because it just seems a presupposition of mine that there couldn’t be something out there that has a design or purpose in mind. Plus of course the logical side of me that thinks the idea of a god pulling levers or at least nudging the game board is a little odd. I guess I like Dawkin’s position which is back to the simpler is better argument though: if there was a designer, then someone had to have designed the designer. And then that just gets ridiculously complicated.
Afternoon babble complete.
Thanks,
Mungo